Home Blog Page 267

Julius Caesar’s Wardrobe And His Special Sleeves

 

When discussing Julius Caesar, most ancient authors (including Caesar in his own war memoirs) mainly focused on the dictator’s military and political maneuverings. The Roman scholar, Suetonius (c. 70-130+), however, was a different type of writer. While most of his peers were eager to study Caesar’s battles and politicking, Suetonius instead glossed over those subjects in favor of more basic topics, such as Julius Caesar’s appearance and wardrobe.

Based on his various sources (memoirs, letters, poems, songs etc.), Suetonius deduced that Caesar was a tall and very well built man with dark-colored eyes. He was apparently very particular about always keeping any stubble on his face cleanly shaved and he took any chance he got to wear a laurel wreath, so as to cover up his balding head.

Suetonius also wrote that Julius Caesar had a reputation for wearing his clothing unusually loose, a habit that supposedly started as far back as the reign of the dictator Sulla (r. 82-79 BCE). In addition, when Caesar began to wear senatorial garb, he apparently made an interesting alteration to the accepted wardrobe—he supposedly had wrist-length sleeves with fringes tailored onto his clothing.

Written by C. Keith Hansley

Picture Attribution: (Painting of Julius Caesar by Clara Grosch c. 1892, in front of a painting of an ancient ruin via pxhere.com, both [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:

Tacitus

 

Tacitus (c. 56-117+)

“To oblige is often as harmful as to offend.”

  • From The Annals of Imperial Rome (XV.21), by Tacitus, translated by Michael Grant (Penguin Classics, 1996).

The Tyrian Troubles Of Alexander The Great

 

From 336-323 BCE, Alexander the Great undertook a remarkable campaign of warfare and conquest, spanning from the Danube River in Europe, all the way to the Indus River on the edge of India. Interestingly, one of the most trying and frustrating conflicts that Alexander the Great endured during his travels took place relatively early on in his career. By the year 332 BCE, Alexander was advancing deep into Phoenicia, following the coastlines of the lands known now as Syria and Lebanon. Most of the cities in Phoenicia and Cyprus had surrendered to Alexander after news spread of his victories over the Persians at the Granicus River (334 BCE) and Issus (333 BCE). Despite this, the most powerful of the Phoenician cities, the island sea power of Tyre, staunchly kept its relationship with Alexander no warmer than neutral.

Diplomacy and negation were tools that Alexander the Great was just as willing to use as warfare. In fact, most of the cities that Alexander the Great encountered during his campaigns chose to surrender peacefully, albeit these defections were undoubtedly inspired by Alexander’s impressive victories against Persian armies. Therefore, when Alexander arrived on the shore beside the island city of Tyre, he initially tried to bring the Tyrians over to his side through peaceful means. First, he tried to use religion to form a relationship with Tyre. He sent a message to the city, expressing his wish to sacrifice in a local temple of Tyre’s patron god, Melcarth (or Melqart), a deity related to the more popular Syrian god, Baal. Alexander was genuinely interested in Melcarth because he had read the writings of Herodotus (5th century BCE), who compared the Tyrian god to the legendary Heracles, a supposed ancestor of Alexander’s lineage. Still, the request was also political, for Alexander insisted that only a temple inside the walls of Tyre would be proper for his sacrifice.

Tyre, however, remained staunch on their policy of neutrality and refused to allow Alexander to enter their city, although they did give him permission to visit a temple of Melcarth located elsewhere. When the Tyrians refused to let Alexander pass through the walls of Tyre, the conquering king decided to end his peaceful tactics and instead began to besiege the city.

Taking the city by force, however, would be no easy feat. About half a mile of water lay between Alexander’s army and the island-city of Tyre. This obstacle was all the more daunting because Alexander had disbanded his navy several years prior. In contrast, Tyre had a formidable navy based out of at least two harbors on their island. The rest of the island city, excluding the harbors, was encircled by defensive walls, which were built up against the water. Nevertheless, the Macedonian king had a plan. Since Alexander did not have any ships to haul his troops across the water, he instead had his soldiers turn the water into land.

The besieging army dismantled old Tyrian buildings and ruins on the mainland to use the rubble as building materials for a path across the water. This earthen bridge, which was supposedly designed to be 200 feet wide, was begun in January of 332 BCE. Using stakes, mud, stones and lumber, Alexander planned to make a large and relatively flat path spanning the half-mile distance from the shore to the island. With the path in place, Alexander would be able to deploy his siege weapons and his army against the city.

Although Alexander had a plan, the Tyrians would prove quite clever in finding ways to disrupt the besieging army’s progress. As Alexander had no naval support, the Tyrian ships had little problem sailing out of their harbors to harass the men dumping rubble into the water. To counter this problem, Alexander had movable towers constructed, and outfitted them with siege engines or archers, which could provide covering fire for the workers on the causeway. With this added protection, the besieging soldiers could continue with their project.

Even though Alexander found a way to keep the Tyrian navy at bay, progress was still frustratingly slow. Some places in the sea between the shore and the island were dauntingly deep, and where the water began to become shallow again near the walls of Tyre, the Tyrian people had preemptively placed obstructions, which would need to be removed before work on Alexander’s causeway could continue. Despite these difficulties, the earthen path steadily crept closer and closer to the walls of Tyre.

Eventually, Alexander’s approaching causeway became so threatening that the Tyrians decided they needed to do something more destructive than merely sending ships to shoot at laborers. To deal a more permanent blow, the defenders in Tyre began to build an interesting ship. The basic frame of that ship was that of a cattle barge, but it had two masts and extra tall bulwarks. The ship, itself, was filled with all of the best flammable materials that the Tyrians had on hand. In addition, hanging from the masts and rigging above the seaborne tinderbox were numerous cauldrons, filled with extra substances that would make a fire burn even hotter and more viciously.

A fearless crew from Tyre sailed this ship toward Alexander’s towers. When they neared the causeway, the crew set everything ablaze and abandoned ship. As the sailors swam to safety, the specially-made ship crashed into the path beside the towers. As the ship jolted to a stop, the suspended cauldrons fell to the ground, causing the ship to explode into an inferno, catching everything nearby on fire—including Alexander’s towers and other siege weapons. The causeway, too, was severely damaged, as much of it had been made of wood. Once the protective towers were destroyed, the rest of the Tyrian navy poured out of their harbors and eventually pushed the besieging army back to the shore.

With this unfortunate setback, Alexander realized that he could not complete his conquest of Tyre without naval support. The problem still existed, however, that he had no navy at that moment. Nevertheless, what he did have was an empire, so he sent out a call-to-arms, summoning the ships of Phoenicia and Cyprus to gather at the nearby loyal city of Sidon. When Alexander later arrived in Sidon to recruit more men for a new causeway, he watched with pleasure as over two hundred warships entered the city’s harbor to answer his call.

When Tyre saw a huge navy on the horizon, they pulled their ships back into the city, plugging the entrance of their harbors with ships and using their sails to obstruct the view into the city. With the waters clear of Tyrian ships, Alexander’s soldiers, assisted by a considerable band of workmen, began construction on another path, which was supposedly planned to be even more broad than the original. To ensure that the work would go on unobstructed, Alexander had the ships from Cyprus blockade the northern harbor, while his Phoenician ships guarded the harbor in the south. With this turn of events, Tyre’s only hope was the help of their formidable ally, Carthage, but, unfortunately for the Tyrian people, Carthage was preoccupied at the time with a war against Syracuse. Nonetheless, Tyre still had a few tricks they had yet to deploy.

When Alexander’s manmade path across the water began to near the city walls, the Tyrians were prompted into action. In the deeper water, much of the work on Alexander’s causeway, including the removal of obstacles placed there by the Tyrians, had to be done by workers on boats. To disrupt this, the engineers of Tyre ingeniously covered some of their ships with durable armor. Using these armored ships, the Tyrians harassed Alexander’s boats that were working near the walls. The armored ships were effective until Alexander’s own engineers were able to duplicate the Tyrian defenses and produce their own naval armor. The Tyrian navy in the northern harbor also tried a surprise attack against the ships from Cyprus. The sailors of Tyre caught the Cyprians off guard and sank several ships, but Alexander quickly sent reinforcements from the southern blockade and he disabled or captured most of the Tyrian ships from the northern harbor. After that, Tyre rarely sent out ships against the besieging forces, although they did still send out divers to sabotage Alexander’s fleet in several ways, including by cutting their anchor lines. Alexander remedied this, too, by using chain instead of rope.

Alexander finally completed his causeway in August, 332 BCE, after seven long and grueling months. Now, he not only set up his siege weapons on the pathway, but also placed siege weapons on his ships. He sailed these siege weapons around the city, testing different sections of the wall for weakness. During these tests, a spot in the southern wall developed a fissure. When Alexander realized this, he sent more ships to threaten the Tyrian harbors, but all the while kept his siege weapons at work on that weakening section of the wall.

When a scalable breech appeared in the southern wall, Alexander launched a multipronged assault on the city. In a simultaneous attack, the Cyprian fleet moved in on the north harbor, the Phoenician fleet advanced on the south harbor, and Alexander climbed the breach in the wall with his most elite soldiers. To add to the confusion, Alexander had more ships circling Tyre, firing randomly at the walls with archers and siege weapons. Apparently, all three major prongs of the attack were successful—the Cyprians took the north harbor, the Phoenicians forced there way in through the south, and Alexander and his troops captured their portion of the wall.

After months of pent-up frustration and anger, Alexander’s army unleashed a slaughter in the city of Tyre. Under pressure from the harbors and the fallen wall, the Tyrians were steadily pushed back deeper into the city. Seeking shelter from the massacre, King Azemilcus and others fled to the shelter of temples inside the city. Interestingly, Alexander supposedly pardoned the people who sought protection from the gods. Yet, for the rest of the Tyrians, fate was unkind. What Alexander did to the residents of Tyre varied from source to source, but all accounts are unpleasant. Each source claimed that thousands of Tyrians died during the assault on Tyre. The account proposed by Arrian (c. 90-173+ CE) also claimed that 30,000 people were enslaved in the aftermath of the siege. Diodorus Siculus (1st century BCE) wrote that besides enslaving thousands, Alexander also crucified 2,000 of the Tyrians. Only Quintus Curtius Rufus (possibly 1st century CE) gave a glimmer of hope for the people of Tyre, as he interestingly claimed that the Phoenicians smuggled thousands of the Tyrians to safety.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Picture Attribution: (Illustration of Alexander besieging Tyre, [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:

  • The Campaigns of Alexander by Arrian, translated by Aubrey de Sélincourt. New York: Penguin Classics, 1971.
  • Alexander the Great by Philip Freeman. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2011.
  • Alexander the Great: The Story of an Ancient Life by Thomas R. Martin and Christopher W. Blackwell. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Chuang Tzu

 

Chuang Tzu (c. 370-287 BCE)

“Let your mind wander in simplicity, blend your spirit with the vastness, follow along with things the way they are, and make no room for personal views – then the world will be governed.”

  • From Chuang Tzu: Basic Writings (section 16, “Fit for Emperors and Kings”), translated by Burton Watson. (Columbia University Press, 1996).

One Of Julius Caesar’s Most Famous Quotes Actually Came From An Ancient Greek Play

 

In 49 BCE, Julius Caesar rested with his army on the Gaul side of the Rubicon River. By crossing the Rubicon, he would be moving his forces without authorization from Gaul into Italy, officially igniting a rebellion against the Roman Senate and its champion, Pompey. To honor the momentous occasion before plunging the Roman Republic into civil war, Julius Caesar reportedly delivered one of his greatest phrases. Suetonius, representing the Latin tradition, claimed that Julius Caesar crossed the river after stating, “the die is cast” (The Twelve Caesars, Divius Julius 32). Plutarch, representing the Greek tradition, instead wrote that Caesar proclaimed, “let the die be cast,” and commented that the phrase was actually a quite commonly-used quote by people who are about to expose their fortunes to peril (Life of Caesar, 32).

The line was a well-known saying because it had been coined centuries before Caesar by the Greek dramatist and comic playwright, Menander (c. 342-291 BCE), who allegedly wrote over a hundred plays during his career. Regardless, what Caesar said at the Rubicon is still debated. Was it coincidence, or paraphrasing, or simply a later embellishment added by commentators? Julius Caesar’s own memoirs only add more questions to the conversation, as he did not deem whatever he said at the Rubicon to be worth recording in his war commentaries.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Picture Attribution: (Julius Caesar “Crossing the Rubicon” from Abbott, Jacob, 1803-1879, [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:

Ignatius of Antioch

 

Ignatius of Antioch (martyred around 110)

“May I have the good fortune to meet my fate without interference!”

  • From the “Letter of Ignatius to the Romans” translated by Cyril C. Richardson (1970) in After The New Testament: A Reader In Early Christianity, edited by Bart D. Ehrman. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Hneftafl—A Mysterious Scandinavian Board Game From The Early Middle Ages

 

Hneftafl (also spelled hnettafl or hnefatafl) was a popular board game that is believed to have originated in Scandinavia or possibly in the northern Germanic lands. Although modern hneftafl games are being sold by nostalgic producers, it likely took a lot of guesswork and improvisation on the part of these companies, for there is very little surviving information on how the authentic hneftafl game was played.

What we do know about the game mainly comes from remnants of the player pieces found in burial mounds and a few brief descriptions of the game found in medieval literature, such as the Icelandic sagas. The game is often compared to chess—they both had light and dark sets of game pieces, and they both had a king that needed to be protected or captured. Hneftafl pieces could sometimes be fairly large in size and they often were made with pegs jutting out underneath, so that the hneftafl pieces could be securely attached to the game board. The pegs must have been fairly long and sturdy, for in one grisly episode from Grettir’s Saga (c. 14th century) the peg from a hneftafl piece was used to gouge out a person’s eye.

Around the time of the crusades, hneftafl’s popularity began to wane under the weight of the skyrocketing rise of chess in Europe. As the northern Europeans converted to chess, hneftafl soon sank to the vague and incomplete shadow that we have of the game today.

Written by C. Keith Hansley.

Picture Attribution: (Odin entertaining guests in Valhalla, by Emil Doepler (1855–1922), [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:

Lao Tzu

 

Lao Tzu (6th and 5th century BCE)

“The way is to the world as the River and the Sea are to
rivulets and streams.”

  • From Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching (Book One, XXXII), translated by D. C. Lau (Penguin Classics, 1963).

Emperor Gaozu Of The Han Dynasty Almost Had His Son-In-Law Executed

 

Zhang Ao was the son of Zhang Er, a politician and general who helped Emperor Gaozu (King of Han c. 206 BCE, emperor r. 202-195 BCE) seize power after the fall of the Qin Dynasty. For his role in Emperor Gaozu’s rise to power, Zhang Er was rewarded with the crown to the kingdom of Zhao, which, of course, was still subservient to the Han emperor. When Zhang Er died in 202 BCE, his son, Zhang Ao, succeeded to the throne of Zhao. His power and prominence increased even further when he married Princess Yuan of Lu, the daughter of Emperor Gaozu and Empress Lü.

Zhang Ao’s relationship with his powerful father-in-law, however, was in no way ideal. Emperor Gaozu did not seem to particularly like the man that his little girl had chosen to spend her life with, so the emperor apparently went out of his way to pick on the king of Zhao. The Han historian, Sima Qian (c. 145-90 BCE), wrote that Emperor Gaozu would rudely laze about in the palace of Zhao, publicly showing his disapproval and indifference toward his son-in-law. King Zhang Ao, for his part, tried to remain as humble as possible, apparently even going to the extent of dismissing his servants and personally serving meals to the emperor.

The sight was so pitiful that even the ministers and generals of Zhao sympathized with their abused king. According to Sima Qian, a group of around ten powerful men, led by Prime Minister Guan Gao, met with Zhang Ao and offered to support the king if he wished to rebel. They also proclaimed that they were willing to hire an assassin to send after the emperor. Sima Qian alleged that Zhang Ao chastised the conspirators and sent them away without granting his blessing, but somehow the conspiracy reached the ears of Emperor Gaozu and the emperor ordered Zhang Ao and his advisors to be arrested.

Sima Qian hinted that many of the Zhao conspirators committed suicide, but at least Zhang Ao and Guan Gao were captured alive. When their king was arrested, several members of the court of Zhao who were not a part of the conspiracy decided to travel to the capital in Chang’an with their heads shaved and dressed like slaves, so that they could show support for their imprisoned liege.

Guan Gao apparently testified that Zhang Ao was innocent, saying that while the conspirators had indeed plotted against the emperor’s life, the king of Zhao had vehemently disapproved of the plan. The Prime Minister of Zhao’s speech convinced the interrogators and the emperor, resulting in the release of Zhang Ao. For his truthfulness, Emperor Gaozu allegedly also pardoned Gauan Gao, yet when the prime minister received confirmation that Zhang Ao had been freed, he committed suicide.

Although Zhang Ao did not face any serious punishment, he was apparently removed from the throne of Zhao. Sill, the husband of the emperor’s daughter could not be left landless. As such, after his release from jail, Zhang Ao was quickly named as the Marquis of Xuanping and his descendants with Princess Yuan became the Kings of Lu.

Written by C. Keith Hansley

Picture Attribution: (A Chinese garden gathering painted by Xie Huan, circa 1437, [Public Domain] via Creative Commons).

Sources:

Homer

 

Homer (flourished c. 700 BCE)

“For of all creatures
that breathe and creep about on the earth, there is none so
miserable as man.”

  • From The Iliad (Book 17) by Homer, translated by E. V. Rieu and revised by Peter Jones (Penguin Classics, 2014).